38 Atlassian AI statistics for 2026 (Rovo + Atlassian Intelligence adoption)

Leaders are constantly told to ‘do AI,’ but there’s a massive gap between a flashy demo and execution at scale. The hardest part is the governance. The real questions are: Is Rovo actually being used, or is it just ‘licensed but idle’ shelfware? Are the answers permission-aware and auditable? And most importantly, is AI measurably clawing back the time lost to searching and manual reporting?

To cut through the noise, we’ve compiled the 38 Atlassian AI adoption statistics for 2026. This is a benchmarking report focused on what’s measurable. It helps enterprise buyers get the hard data they need to validate their investment.

Key Atlassian AI statistics for 2026 

  • 5M MAU: Rovo sailed past 5 million monthly active users. (Atlassian, Q2 FY26 shareholder letter) 
  • 25%: Knowledge workers spend 25% of their time searching for answers (positioned by Atlassian as the core problem that “Rovo Search” addresses). (Atlassian)
  • 2.4M workflow automations (last 6 months): Rovo agents helped automate 2.4 million workflow automations across Atlassian’s customer base in the last six months. (Atlassian
  • 40%: By the end of 2026, 40% of enterprise applications will include integrated task-specific AI agents (Gartner)
  • 60-70%: Generative AI + other technologies could automate work activities that absorb 60-70% of employees’ time today (McKinsey Global Institute)

Current market state: agentic AI shift and Atlassian’s approach

In 2026, enterprise AI is shifting from “help me write” to “help me do”. That means more task execution (agents that take steps in tools) and less standalone chat. As soon as AI touches real work systems, the buyer conversation stops being about novelty and starts being about control: permissions, audit trails, and predictable behavior.

Atlassian’s approach is to anchor AI in the work-layer teams already use: Jira issues, Confluence pages, service records, and goals, so AI can retrieve context and (increasingly) act without bypassing enterprise access controls.

Quick definitions (how this article uses the terms):

  • Rovo: Atlassian’s AI experience for enterprise search, chat, and agents across Atlassian and connected tools, focused on finding answers and taking action in context.
  • Atlassian Intelligence: AI features embedded inside Atlassian apps (e.g., summaries, writing support, suggestions, AI-assisted workflows), often surfaced through Rovo and product-native experiences.
  • Teamwork Collection: Atlassian’s bundled suite of core apps, designed to standardize how teams plan, track, and document work. Relevant because AI performs better when work and knowledge are organized consistently across teams.
  • Agent: An AI capability that executes steps (e.g., gather context, draft an update, create/route work) rather than only generating text.
  • MAU: Monthly active users, a practical way to separate “enabled” from “actually used”.

Let’s start with adoption benchmarks, so you can compare your trajectory to what “real usage” looks like at scale.

Rovo and Atlassian AI adoption and usage patterns 

Enterprise rollouts usually move in phases: prove value with a few teams, expand across core apps, then push adoption into business functions. These benchmarks show what Atlassian publicly reports on AI usage at scale, plus the signals that typically determine whether AI can spread beyond early adopters.

MAU growth (platform adoption signals)

  1. 5 million MAU: Rovo sailed past 5 million monthly active users. (Atlassian Q2 FY26 shareholder letter
  2. 5%: Across thousands of Jira customers, those using AI code-gen tools have 5% higher MAU, and expand seats 5% faster than those that don’t. (Atlassian Q2 FY26 shareholder letter)
  3. 50% QoQ: Atlassian reported AI MAU was up 50% quarter-over-quarter. (Atlassian Q1 FY26 shareholder letter

“In probably 8 weeks, we saw full adoption [of Rovo]. It’s used by 70% of our company. In about six weeks, we created 200 Rovo agents, and they’re not only helping employees but also increasing productivity and capacity. The power for some of the AI capabilities is how it flows and the context shifting that employees and people have to do with all of that choice. When you have a system that goes across the stack, that is incredibly powerful, and we’re not having to retrain every single time on a new tool or new technology. There’s a familiarity there for our employees.”

Chris Burgess, CIO, Expedia Group

Features and capabilities (how deeply AI shows up in daily work)

These stats are practical “usability signals” for Rovo and Atlassian AI. They indicate whether AI has enough context, coverage across tools, and workflow embedded to be used repeatedly in real work. 

  1. 100B+ objects & connections: Teamwork Graph is now well past 100 billion objects and connections (the context layer Atlassian uses to power AI across work and knowledge). (Atlassian Q2 FY26 shareholder letter
  2. 50 connectors (and counting): Rovo Search cited 50 connectors across Atlassian and third parties. (Atlassian Team ’25 “Rovo for all” announcement)
  3. 2.4 million automations (in 6 months): Rovo agents helped automate 2.4 million workflow automations across Atlassian’s customer base over the prior six months. (Atlassian Q1 FY26 shareholder letter)
9 atlassian ai statistics adoption 2026

Together, they show whether Atlassian AI is built to function as an everyday work layer. 

Rollout phases by team type (suite adoption + expansion beyond IT)

AI adoption rarely scales when it’s bolted onto a single app or team. Teamwork Collection is relevant here because it’s Atlassian’s packaging signal that customers are standardizing across multiple workstreams (planning, tracking, knowledge) and expanding seats beyond the initial technical core. These conditions typically make Rovo/AI rollouts more measurable across departments.

  1. 1 million seats: Teamwork Collection passed 1 million seats. (Atlassian Q2 FY26 shareholder letter
  2. 1,000 customers: Teamwork Collection passed 1,000 customers. (Atlassian Q2 FY26 shareholder letter)

With Atlassian Teamwork Collection and Rovo, we’re automating incident documentation, streamlining help desk responses, and enabling seamless project updates. We’re moving towards our goal to reduce manual work by 30%, empowering every team to focus on higher value outcomes.”

Vladislav Tsapko, VP, Business Operations, Insurity

  1. 10%+ seat expansion: Teamwork Collection expands seat counts by 10%+ over standalone app footprints. (Atlassian Q2 FY26 shareholder letter)
  2. 74%: Of surveyed customers at Team ’25 Europe expected to increase Atlassian product usage due to GenAI tools. (Atlassian Q1 FY26 shareholder letter
  3. Up more than 2x: Data Center → Cloud migrations were up more than 2x over the prior year. (Atlassian Q1 FY26 shareholder letter)  
  4. 80%: Atlassian reported 80% of the Fortune 500 are customers. (Atlassian Q2 FY26 shareholder letter)
  5. 50%: Atlassian reported 50% of its AI users are in finance, HR, marketing, ops, and other non-technical teams. (Atlassian Q2 FY26 shareholder letter)
  6. Approximately 5%: Across thousands of Jira customers, users of AI code-generation tools create approximately 5% more tasks in Jira. (Atlassian Q2 FY26 shareholder letter)

Ready to make Atlassian AI usable across your company?

Our experts will help you set up Atlassian Intelligence across Jira, JSM, and Confluence. Join teams who already have their answers in seconds.
Book your consultation

Knowledge findability and time saved

These statistics quantify two buyer-relevant realities in 2026. First is the “answer-hunt” tax inside large organizations. Second is whether Atlassian AI/Rovo is showing measurable improvements in retrieval and reuse. 

Time spent searching for answers

  1. Over 25%: Teams spend over 25% of their workweek searching for information. (State of Teams 2025 highlight
  2. 2.4 billion hours/year: Fortune 500 teams are wasting 2.4 billion hours searching for information each year. (State of Teams 2025 highlight
  3. 20%: Just 20% of knowledge workers feel confident that their team has an effective process for quickly informing other teams of decisions that may impact their work (Atlassian State of Teams 2025) 
  4. 71%: 71% of teams admit they aren’t maximizing the use of AI to help them manage and discover information (State of Teams 2025 highlight
  5. 50+ hours/year: Each Atlassian engineer saves 50+ hours per year with Rovo. (Teamwork Lab / System of Work highlights)
  6. 90 minutes per week: people using Loom AI save at least 90 minutes per week on meetings. That’s nearly 10 work days each year. (Teamwork Lab / System of Work highlights). 

Knowledge reuse rates

  1. Over 78%: Over 78% of Rovo Search users say Rovo is better than any search experience they’ve had in the past. (Atlassian Q1 FY26 shareholder letter
  2. More than 20%: Atlassian reported more than a 20% improvement in search relevance (since January 2026, at the time of writing). (Atlassian Q1 FY26 shareholder letter) 
  3. 35%: Atlassian reported a 35% improvement in search performance (since January, at the time of writing). (Atlassian Q1 FY26 shareholder letter)
  4. 60%: Users are 60% more successful with Rovo Search than a leading open-source enterprise search engine. (Team ’25 Rovo announcement
  5. 5.4x: When teams unleash collective knowledge, they are more likely to produce high-quality work (Atlassian State of Teams 2025) 
  6. 2.3x: If teams manage knowledge well across the organization, they’re 2.3x more likely to stick to high-priority work (Atlassian State of Teams 2025) 
5 proof pairs that explains why rollouts stall

AI governance and trust

AI doesn’t scale on good intentions. It scales when admins can control access and prove what happened when something goes wrong.

Data access controls (data readiness + regulatory pressure)

  1. 63%: Organizations either do not have or are unsure if they have the right data management practices for AI. (Gartner)
  2. 60%: Through 2026, organizations will abandon 60% of AI projects unsupported by AI-ready data. (Gartner
  3. 75% + 4x: By 2030, fragmented AI regulation will quadruple and extend to 75% of the world’s economies. (Gartner)
  4. $492M (2026) → $1B+ (2030): Spending on AI governance is expected to reach $492 million in 2026 and surpass $1 billion by 2030. (Gartner

Permissioning (permission-aware retrieval)

  1. 30 days: For Rovo Chat and agents, Atlassian retains your inputs and outputs for 30 days (safety/security). (Atlassian Support)
  2. 30 days: If an org admin disconnects a third-party app from Rovo, Atlassian deletes the indexed third-party content within 30 days (connector exceptions noted). (Atlassian Support)

Auditability (can you trace actions and investigate fast)

Note: we reference Atlassian Cloud Standard/Enterprise because Rovo and Atlassian AI inherit their “trust layer” from the Cloud Enterprise stack. It includes central admin controls, Guard capabilities, and audit logging. 

  1. 2-tier access: Rovo activities are tracked in the audit log; admin actions are available to Guard Standard/Premium, while user actions are available to Guard Premium. (Atlassian)
  2. 95%: Implementing Atlassian Guard Standard’s advanced audit logs resulted in a 95% reduction in investigation time. (Forrester TEI spotlight for Atlassian Guard Standard
  3. 28%: Cloud Enterprise audit visibility resulted in a 28% less time spent monitoring user activity. (Forrester TEI Atlassian Cloud Enterprise

Risk reduction outcomes (does governance reduce exposure)

  1. 35%: Average reduction in monthly security incidents or escalations after implementing Cloud Enterprise security and compliance controls. (Forrester TEI Atlassian Cloud Enterprise
  2. 31%: Reduction in spend on audit fees with improved security given Cloud Enterprise audit-readiness and compliance capabilities. (Forrester TEI Atlassian Cloud Enterprise
  3. 3.4x: Organizations that deployed AI governance platforms are 3.4x more likely to achieve high levels of AI governance effectiveness. (Gartner
9 governance stats that explain why rollouts stall

Governance guardrails checklist (validate before you scale)

Your adoption stats (MAU, agents, automations) only matter if people can use AI safely day-to-day. Without guardrails, the pattern is predictable: a few teams adopt fast, then rollout stalls after the first access scare, compliance question, or “where did this answer come from?” moment.

Why do this now: it keeps Rovo usable across more teams (including non-technical users), protects sensitive spaces/projects, and makes outcomes measurable. 

Cost of skipping it: pilot freeze, shadow usage, messy connector sprawl, and painful audit cycles because no one can prove what data AI touched.

Permission-aware answers

  • Test with real roles (admin/standard/restricted) and confirm outputs differ correctly.
  • Verify AI does not summarize content users can’t access, even via connectors.

Data access controls

  • Start with an allowlist: which projects/spaces/repos are in scope.
  • Restrict who can add connectors and who can expand indexing.

Auditability

  • Make sure you can trace: who asked, what sources were used, what was returned, and what actions were taken (agents).
  • Ensure logs are searchable/exportable and have an owner (security/compliance).

Agent safety

  • Use least privilege for agent scopes.
  • Require confirmation for high-impact actions (edit, approve, notify, share).

Retention + sensitive data

  • Align retention of prompts/outputs with your policy.
  • Train users: no secrets/regulated data unless explicitly approved.

The fastest way to scale Rovo is to prove control early, so every new team doesn’t trigger a new compliance debate.

AI metrics dashboard: what to measure

AI is like any other enterprise project: if you don’t measure it, you can’t prove the investment paid off (or see where it’s leaking value). And when budgets tighten, “people say they like it” won’t survive procurement. Track four buckets:

Adoption and usage

  • Rovo MAU by product and team type (business vs technical)
  • Search: active users, repeat usage, “no results” rate
  • Agents: agents created, runs/week, % completed without escalation

Knowledge quality

  • Search success (click-through/answer reuse)
  • Median time-to-answer for top internal questions
  • Duplicate-work signals (repeat questions, repeat tickets/RFCs)

Governance and trust

  • Permission exceptions caught (you want visibility, not silence)
  • Audit coverage for AI events (request → sources → output → action)
  • Investigation time + audit-prep time trends

Impact

  • Hours saved vs baseline “search time”
  • Reduction in manual reporting effort
  • Risk cost trend: incidents/escalations + audit effort/fees
9 AI KPI metrics to separate enabled from valuable

Remember, if you can’t tie these metrics to a clear before/after baseline, instead of scaling AI, you’re just turning it on. 

Implement Rovo safely and measure effects from day one

We set permission-aware answers, connector access controls, audit-ready logging, and an AI metrics dashboard, so you can roll out to more teams with proof of control.
Book your Rovo consultation

Conclusion and next steps. What to plan first?

Assume two things: AI agents will become a normal way work gets done, and governance will become a hard requirement. That means your plan should focus less on feature enablement and more on making AI usable at scale.

Start by baselining the waste you want to remove. If you can’t quantify how much time your org loses searching for answers and redoing work, you won’t be able to prove improvement later. Then pick a small set of workflows where Rovo can win fast and visibly: enterprise search for common questions, faster incident and change communication, and repeatable reporting. Measure adoption and outcomes from day one, so you can separate “enabled” from “used” and “used” from “valuable.”

Before you expand to more teams or add more connectors, lock in the guardrails. Treat permissioning, indexing boundaries, retention, and auditability as the foundation. Once you can show that answers respect access rules and actions are traceable, you can scale with less friction from security and compliance.Finally, roll out by team type. Business teams and technical teams adopt differently, so your governance needs to match. If you want this to stick in 2026, treat Atlassian AI like a platform rollout with clear ownership and measurable outcomes.

[Atlassian AI statistics] FAQs

Katarzyna Kornaga

Katarzyna is a Content Specialist, responsible for writing on the Deviniti blog. She values helpful, unique content where users can find answers to their questions. When not writing, you can find her walking her dog, Loki, flowing through Ashtanga yoga classes, or curled up with a good book at home.

More from this author